* *

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 00:20:20

Login with username, password and session length
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rule debate  (Read 1966 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Keve

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • 2 Iron
  • ***
  • Posts: 4861
  • Thanks: 24
Re: Rule debate
« Reply #30 on: Apr 05, 2011, 17:45:36 »
It's not just that area Jim, think of the 17th par 3, go through the green and you're on the other course.
Logged

Offline BigJim

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hybrid / 5 Wood
  • ****
  • Posts: 6806
  • Thanks: 50
Re: Rule debate
« Reply #31 on: Apr 05, 2011, 18:02:05 »
You're right - although I've got enough trouble reaching it - without going through the back....
Logged

Offline Keve

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • 2 Iron
  • ***
  • Posts: 4861
  • Thanks: 24
Re: Rule debate
« Reply #32 on: Apr 05, 2011, 18:09:32 »
Countless times I've played the 17th and 18th on the Carrickstone course nowhere near where the 2 courses meet but technically I'm in breach if I go onto the Antonine for a medal. I even know for a certain fact I have won a 4 man competition where 3 of us have played the other course beforehand.
Logged

Offline golf_bhoy

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • 3 Iron
  • ***
  • Posts: 3365
  • Thanks: 15
  • I need coffee ...
Re: Rule debate
« Reply #33 on: Apr 05, 2011, 22:15:45 »
Quote from: BigJim on Apr 05, 2011, 13:16:18
Now you know why I'm not a cartogropher....

Your cartography is fine, it's your shot shape I'm trying to figure out ..  :laugh:
Logged
Nobody ever saw a slow player in a mirror.

2011 : 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Recent