0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Follow the link below to a thread started by John Corbett over on GM back in 2005.The main text in his opening post is a copy of some email correspondence between myself and Claire Bates, Assistant Director - Equipment Standards at the R&A.http://www.golfmagic.com/forum/forummessages/mps/dt/4/UTN/19408/Also have a look at the 7th post down from Colinski where he says that Sureshot have released a software upgrade to the Sureanalysis software package (which came with the Sureshot) that meant that you could only activate the club recommendation feature from within the PC app. This allowed the club recommendation feature to be turned off so the device was legal in competitions. I dont beleive that the rules regarding DMD's or "artificial devices giving advice" has changed since May 2005 so a Sureshot with the club recommendation facility still active is "illegal" for competetive play.Even Rod Brown the MD of Motocaddy effectively admitted they were illegal (on page 2 of the above quoted thread) with the club suggestion feature activated.My apologies for relinking to a thread duplicating allready linked to by MS3. I knew that at some time in the deep past I'd emailed the R&A to get clarity on the sureshot Club Recommendation facility and was overly excited that I'd found someone quoting my email.
FWIW as an outsider not playing in the event, Banditudes pro is wrong re: the club selection feature. It falls under advice in the rules and is therefore illegal for competition play. Also as stated above the club can not introduce a local rule which disregards a rule of golf.
The club recommendation facility can only be turned off/on from the PC software,so what you're saying is that they are perfectly legal in comps as long as it's turned off?
If there is any uncertainty over this and to save any arguments, then why dont sureshot owners playing in the event just stick black tape over the screen as Motocaddy did for the S3?
One thing I've noticed over the years is the number of golfers playing in comps who haven't a clue about some of the basic Rules, and it bugs the crap out of me to have to send an opponent back to the tee for a lost ball on a par 3 when he wanted to "just drop one here and play my third" from somewhere near the vicinity of the green, because "That's the Rule and it's what me and my mates do in a medal ...". Dorks.
It might be worthwhile one of you putting a thread on GM asking about this. Two of the members there (DH and Rules Doc) are rules officials and I have yet to see either of them stumped by a rules question/query.
John, I'd agree, and it's not that that's in contention, its if the device tells you "150yds, that's a 7 iron"
John, I'd agree, and it's not that that's in contention, its if the device tells you "150yds, that's a 7 iron"This is judged as outside advice i.e. just like asking your opponent what club he used. Yes, you could get the same info from your playing partner or caddie, but they are judged as an extension of you.Remember that the rule covers all DMDs, not just the one that you have, and they are all inherently capable of taking into account more than just the horizontal distance between you and the pin. e.g. Hotbaws laser rangefinder will easily tell you the distance to the pin, the real distance i.e. up or down the slope and the height difference I believe, thus giving info that is not legal. Similarly, your GPS device also gets height co-ordinates for where you are and where the green is, and it COULD take these into consideration, and base a club recommendation on this.It would be almost impossible to prove one way or another whether this was happening, hence, depite it being a seemingly trivial matter based on the equipment that you have, the rules have to take consideration of everything that is and could become available